Why bonds pay more than a bank FD
An FD and a corporate bond both promise a fixed rate for a fixed term, so they get compared as if they were the same thing. They differ in who stands behind the promise. DICGC's guide to deposit insurance lists savings, fixed, current and recurring deposits as covered, and lists stocks and bonds, and deposits mobilised by NBFCs, as not covered. Its FAQ puts the cover at Rs 5,00,000 per depositor per bank, principal and interest together.
A bond has no such backstop. SEBI's FAQ on the corporate bond market says that when an issuer defaults, you may lose all or a substantial part of your investment, and that even for listed bonds there is no certainty a liquid secondary market will develop. An FD can usually be broken early for a penalty; a bond can only be sold to someone who wants it, at a price that person sets. The gap between the two rates is the issuer paying you to accept that.
- Deposit insurance is why a 7 percent FD can be compared with cash. Once money moves into a bond, the comparison is with lending, and lending is judged on who the borrower is
- Two bonds at 9.5 percent are not equally risky because their rates match; the rating and the issuer's finances decide that
- Government securities usually yield less than corporate bonds of the same tenure because the credit question is different






