The one distinction that organises everything
The technique
Permanent or temporary - ask this before deciding anything
Milton Friedman's permanent income hypothesis says consumption should track the income you expect to earn over a lifetime, not the amount that arrived this month. Franco Modigliani's life-cycle hypothesis, which won the 1985 Nobel, makes the same argument across a working life: borrow when young, accumulate in peak earning years, draw down later. Both describe smoothing. Almost all avoidable financial damage comes from doing the opposite - consuming spikes and borrowing through troughs.
Two questions sort almost every money event you will face.
Is it predictable, or not? And is the money change permanent, or temporary?
That is a four-box grid, and each box has one correct instrument. Using the wrong one is not a moral failing; it is a category error, and it has a price.
| Predictable | Unpredictable | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense | Sinking fund - festivals, school fees, insurance renewals, a wedding with a date | Emergency fund - medical, repairs, a job gap. Plus insurance for the large ones |
| Income | Permanent: a raise or promotion. Escalate savings on the day it lands | Transitory: bonus, tax refund, gift. Capital, not income |
- Most people run one pot for all four, which means the predictable events consume the money meant for the unpredictable ones
- The test for predictable is not certainty, it is whether you could have written it on a calendar a year ago
- A bonus is not a small raise. A raise is not a large bonus. Treating either as the other is the most common error on this page






